tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7430921123281506833.post4792902496484898530..comments2023-09-28T08:40:45.617-04:00Comments on Danielle Takacs: Galloping Around the Golden Horseshoe: Quenching Nestle’s Big Thirst in GuelphDanielle Takacshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07298674716918123751noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7430921123281506833.post-83915535687389407522007-10-09T08:57:00.000-04:002007-10-09T08:57:00.000-04:00You're a moron if you say you care about the water...You're a moron if you say you care about the water issue, and then continue to support Liz... if you really cared about water here in Guelph, you'd vote for Polley or Mann-Bowers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7430921123281506833.post-29881012962004019282007-09-23T17:45:00.000-04:002007-09-23T17:45:00.000-04:00Because there isnt a lack of water there may be a ...Because there isnt a lack of water there may be a lack of holding resevoirs and processing capacity for the water in event of fire`. Gielph did not have chlorinated water or holding capacity required by the province after Walkerton. Since GUelph`s water comes from an artesian well it has absolutely nothing to do with river levels or even rain fall ion the area. Guelph is a bit fucked, sorry it is and the current council is filled with self righteous morrons who know very little about what they are discussing especially when it comes to the "environment". <BR/><BR/>The ban is because more people water their lawns when its dry and reduce the ability of the fire department to access water in event of fire. Even in somewhere like Fergus where water is taken from the river for domestic use it is put right back after its processed. Even water sprinnkled on lawns will find its way back to the river. Watering bans have nothing to do with river levels and everything to do with resevoir capacity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com